4.7 Article

Preparation and pyrolysis of two Amadori analogues as flavor precursors

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105357

Keywords

Amadori analogue; Flavor precursor; Thermal pyrolysis; Maillard reaction

Funding

  1. Key Scientific Research Projects of Universities of Henan Province [21A150022]
  2. program of Henan Agricultural University [30500569, KJCX2021A12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study synthesized two Amadori analogues and evaluated their potential as flavor precursors through thermal analysis. Results showed that the flavor profiles of the analogues were different from Amadori compounds and were influenced by pyrolytic temperatures. Possible mechanisms of the pyrolytic processes were also proposed.
Amadori compounds, produced during Maillard reaction, are considered as precursors of flavor compounds. On the basis of Amadori compounds, herein two Amadori analogues, di-O-isopropylidene-2,3:4,5-beta-D-fructopyr-anosyl alanine ester (A-ARP) and di-O-isopropylidene-2,3:4,5-beta-D-fructopyranosyl proline ester (P-ARP), were chemically synthesized and their possibility as flavor precursors was evaluated by thermogravimetry (TG), derivative thermogravimetry (DTG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). TG-DTG analyses indicated that the samples were stable at room temperature, and the largest mass-loss rates (T-p) were at 208 and 278 degrees C, respectively. Upon thermal pyrolysis, the major flavor substances were butan-2-one, ethyl propionate, furfural, and DL-limonene for A-ARP, while 2,5-dimethylfuran, heptan-2-one, acetophenone, and H-1-pyrrole for P-ARP. The flavor profiles are different from that of corresponding Amadori compounds, and are influenced by pyrolytic temperatures. These results provide one method to regulate the species and amounts of the degraded flavor products. Finally, the possible mechanisms of the pyrolytic processes are proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available