4.7 Article

Ultrafine hollow Fe3O4 anode material modified with reduced graphene oxides for high-power lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 894, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162384

Keywords

anode materials; ultrafine hollow Fe3O4 nanosphere; lithium-ion batteries; reduced graphene oxides

Funding

  1. Guangdong Science and Technology Program [2020B121201003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002352]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A composite material consisting of ultrafine Fe3O4 anchored in reduced graphene oxides is synthesized for application in lithium-ion battery anodes. The hollow Fe3O4/rGO composites show superior specific capacity and cyclic stability compared to solid Fe3O4/rGO composites, attributed to the ultrafine hollow structure shortening Li+ diffusion path and conductive rGO facilitating rapid electron transfer.
In this work, a composite material consisting of ultrafine Fe3O4 with (ca. 15 nm) uniformly anchored in reduced graphene oxides (rGO) is synthesized and reported to be applied in anodes for lithium-ion battery. The obtained hollow Fe3O4 /rGO composites (H-Fe3O4/rGO) (827.3 mA h g(-1)) has much superior specific capacity than that of the solid Fe3O4/rGO composites (S-Fe3O4/rGO) (654.9 mA h g(-1)) after 550 cycles of the coin cell at 0.5 A g(-1). Even if the cells are tested at 1 A g(-1), H-Fe3O4/rGO displays a remarkable specific capacity of 917.4 mA h g(-1) as well as the capacity retention rate of 56.7%, compared with S-Fe3O4/rGO (573.9 mA h g(-1), the capacity retention rate of 37.7%). Such a sufficient cyclic stability and rate capability in the H-Fe3O4/rGO composite is mainly attributed to the ultrafine hollow structure for shortening Li+ diffusion path and conductive rGO beneficial to rapid electron transfer. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available