4.7 Article

Cation occupancy in bimagnetic CoO-core/Co1-xZnxFe2O4-shell (x=0-1) nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 877, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160172

Keywords

Core/Shell nanoparticles; Cobalt zinc ferrites; Cation distribution; X-ray absorption spectroscopy; Mossbauer spectroscopy

Funding

  1. ANPCyT [PICT-2016-0288, PICT-2018-02565]
  2. UNCuyo [06/C527, 06/C528, C042]
  3. CNPq
  4. CONICET

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cation occupancy of bimagnetic CoO/Co1-xZnxFe2O4 core/shell nanoparticles was studied using X-ray absorption and Mossbauer spectroscopies. The results show that Co and Zn cations mainly occupy octahedral and tetrahedral sites, respectively, while Fe cations are distributed in both sites. This study can guide the interpretation of magnetic properties in complex bimagnetic systems for future technological applications.
In this work, we studied the cation occupancy of bimagnetic CoO/Co1-xZnxFe2O4 core/shell nanoparticles by means of X-ray absorption and Mossbauer spectroscopies, which provide element-sensitive information at the atomic scale. Our results indicate that, although the spinel ferrite forms a multi-grain shell, the Zn cations occupy solely tetrahedral sites, while the Co cations are mostly in the octahedral site. On the other hand, the Fe cations are distributed in both tetrahedral and octahedral sites for all concentrations. Also the results provide evidence for a Zn-deficient spinel with an excess of Co cations in the shell, whose origin is further rationalized in terms of the two-step synthesis process. In overall, this work gives a description of the cation occupancy in the core/shell nanoparticles and can serve as a guide to the interpretation of the magnetic properties of complex bimagnetic systems for future technological applications. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available