4.7 Article

Amorphous three-dimensional porous Co3O4 nanowire network toward superior OER catalysis by lithium-induced

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 893, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162287

Keywords

Three-dimensional porous nanowire; Amorphous; Co3O4; Lithium-induced; Oxygen evolution reaction (OER)

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21878340]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program Project [2019YFC1907805]
  3. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project of China [2017TP1001]
  4. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2020JJ5693]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Co3O4 as a potential catalyst for OER, synthesized as a nanowire network on nickel foam, was transformed through a lithium-ion rocking chair mechanism to improve OER performance.
Co3O4 has been proven to be a potential catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) because of its low cost and abundant resources. However, pure Co3O4 has the disadvantages of poor conductivity and low catalytic activity. Here, we successfully synthesized three-dimensional (3D) network Co3O4 composed of nanowires grown on nickel foam (NF). Using a lithium-ion rocking chair transport mechanism, Co3O4 nanowires were transformed into porous amorphous Co3O4, which greatly reduces the resistance in the OER process and enhances active site exposure. Meanwhile, the increase of Co2+ greatly improved the OER performance. However, excessive cycling of lithium-ion batteries can form a thick solid electrolyte interface (SEI) on the surface, which has a negative impact on OER. Specifically, we found that 5-cycle Co3O4 has the best OER performance, showing an initial potential of 1.42 V vs RHE, a reduced overpotential of 311 mV at 50 mA cm-2 and a low Tafel slope of 76 mV decade-1, which is better than commercial RuO2. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available