4.6 Article

Impacts of saline stress on the physiology of Saccharum complex genotypes

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE
Volume 208, Issue 1, Pages 120-126

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jac.12577

Keywords

abiotic stress; chlorophyll; photosynthesis; salinity tolerance; transpiration

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [334 303767/2020-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of the physiological mechanisms in saline environments may enhance sugarcane breeding programs targeting abiotic stresses. The study found that certain genotypes of Saccharum exhibited higher photosynthetic rates, carbon dioxide concentrations, transpiration rates, and chlorophyll content under salt stress, indicating their potential superiority in physiological performance. Photosynthesis and transpiration are the most suitable parameters for screening, but the SPAD index is the most practical tool due to its ease of determination and cost-effectiveness.
Knowledge of the physiological mechanisms in saline environment may boost sugarcane breeding programmes targeting abiotic stresses. Our hypothesis is that the physiology of Saccharum genotypes responds differently under salt stress. Thus, the objective of the study was to evaluate the physiological performance of Saccharum complex genotypes grown under presence and absence of saline stress. The experimental design used was randomized blocks arranged in a 32 x 2 factorial scheme (32 genotypes x 2 salinity levels). The presence of salinity provided higher mean values for photosynthetic rate in genotypes G4, G18, G22, G25 and G29 compared with the environment without salinity, with mean values (17.26, 21.49, 24.22 and 26.19 mu mol CO(2)m(-2)s(-1)), respectively, for internal CO2 concentration in G2, G6, G9, G14, G17, G19, G23 and G29, with mean values (323.45, 399.64, 386.88, 412.14, 366.31, 250.48, 379.10 and 380.75 mu mol CO2 mol air(-1)), respectively, for transpiration in G18, G24, G25 and G29, with mean values (5.05, 3.30, 4.39 and 4.01 mmol H2O m(-2)s(-1)), respectively, and for chlorophyll content in G3, G5, G6, G8, G10, G13, G20, G22, G23, G25, G31 and G32, with mean values (34.18, 43.01, 38.08, 32.38, 37.09, 37.18, 32.47, 38.38, 38.04, 36.95 and 33.32 SPAD units) respectively. Genotypes that under salt stress increase their physiological performance demonstrate superiority over others and should be considered in breeding programmes. Photosynthesis and transpiration is the most adequate combination for screening, but the spad index is the most viable tool because of its ease of determination and cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available