4.7 Article

Enzymatic Production of Xylo-oligosaccharides from Destarched Wheat Bran and the Impact of Their Degree of Polymerization and Substituents on Their Utilization as a Carbon Source by Probiotic Bacteria

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue 44, Pages 13217-13226

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c02888

Keywords

destarched wheat bran; xylanase GH11; xylo-oligosaccharides; arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides; feruloylated arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides; prebiotic effect

Funding

  1. VITO (Belgium)
  2. University of Reims (France): VITO grant [Reims_URCA_PhD_1701]
  3. French Region Grand Est
  4. French Region Grand Reims

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The enzymatic production of xylo-oligosaccharides from destarched wheat bran was studied, and the fractions produced were found to stimulate the growth of specific gut bacteria, suggesting their potential as prebiotics.
The enzymatic production of xylo-oligosaccharides (XOs) from destarched wheat bran with a GH11 xylanase was studied. Xylo-oligosaccharides (XOs) produced were separated into different fractions according to their degree of polymerization (DP) and the nature of their substituents: arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides (AXOs) with a DP from 2 to 3 and DP from 2 to 6 and feruloylated arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides (FAXOs) esterified by ferulic and p-coumaric acids with a DP from 3 to 6. Both AXOs (short and long DP) and FAXOs stimulated the growth of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Prevotella copri similarly but not Lactobacillus rhamnosus. The utilization of AXOs and FAXOs as a carbon source resulted in the increase in turbidity, decrease in pH, and production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in the culture broth. The highest amount of SCFAs was produced by F. prausnitzii using FAXOs. Results suggest that FAXOs and AXOs have the potential to be considered as prebiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available