4.7 Article

MALDI-TOF MS and Magnetic Beads for Rapid Seafood Allergen Tests

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue 43, Pages 12909-12918

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04723

Keywords

magnetic beads (MBs); allergen; sablefish; immunomagnetic separation (IMS); matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21804087]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18050502200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A strategy combining IMS and MALDI-TOF MS was developed to test seafood allergens, with consistent results compared to ELISA tests and a 0% false positive rate. The method shows potential for detecting seafood allergens to ensure the safety of allergic patients.
We developed a strategy using immunomagnetic separation (IMS) coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to test seafood allergens. The protocol employed commercial magnetic beads (MBs) functionalized with anti-human IgE antibodies to carry out the IMS of IgEs in blood samples, followed by capture of allergens from seafood protein extracts for allergy analysis. After elution, the captured allergens were identified by MALDI-TOF MS and HPLC-MS/MS. The non-specific adsorption of MBs to biomolecules, the reproducibility and sensitivity of the protocol were investigated. The method shows consistent results with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests. The false positive rate of the present method for the allergy test is 0%. The protocol was applied to detect the allergens in greasy-back shrimp for checking the allergenicity of patients' serum. Cooking fish as soup may effectively decrease the allergenicity. The method can be potentially used to identify unknown allergens of seafood to ensure the safety of allergic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available