4.7 Article

Fast Determination of a Novel Iron Chelate Prototype Used as a Fertilizer by Liquid Chromatography Coupled to a Diode Array Detector

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue 51, Pages 15746-15754

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05943

Keywords

benzeneacetic acid; 2-hydroxy-alpha-[(2-hydroxyethyl) amino]; liquid chromatography; iron deficiency; micronutrients; agronomic efficiency

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RTI2018-096268-B-I00]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid (Spain)
  3. ERDF [AGRISOST-CM S2018/BAA-4330]
  4. ESF [AGRISOST-CM S2018/BAA-4330]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new prototype iron chelate was developed and validated using liquid chromatography, showing that the analytical method is suitable for quantification of the iron chelate. The method was found to be selective, precise, and robust for this purpose.
The environmental risk of the application of synthetic chelates has favored the implementation of new biodegradable ligands to correct Fe-deficient plants. This study developed and validated an analytical method for determination of a new prototype iron chelate-Fe(III)-benzeneacetate, 2-hydroxy-alpha-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-(BHH/Fe3+) based on liquid chromatography with diode array detection, as a potential sustainable alternative. Chromatographic analysis was performed on a LiChrospher RP-18 in reverse-phase mode, with a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile (solvent A) and sodium borate buffer 0.20 mM at pH = 8 (solvent B) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min in isocratic elution mode. This method was fully validated and found to be linear from the limit of quantification (LOQ) to 50 mg/L and precise (standard deviation below 5%). The proposed method was demonstrated to be selective, precise, and robust. The developed methodology indicated that it is suitable for the quantification of iron chelate BHH/Fe3+.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available