4.7 Article

Integrative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota and Metabolome for In Vitro Human Gut Fermentation Modeling

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue 50, Pages 15414-15424

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04259

Keywords

Gut microbiota; in vitro fermentation; metabolomics; 16s sequencing; SCFAs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32001696]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that different culture media have varying effects on the bacterial community structure and metabolites, with the AMB medium being the most effective in maintaining a stable bacterial community structure and producing fewer metabolites and short-chain fatty acids. Culturing with AMB medium for 48 hours is considered the most suitable in vitro model for human gut microbiota fermentation, providing an alternative approach for diet and health research.
This study aimed to find the best in vitro fermentation method by integrative analysis of the gut microbiota and metabolome. We selected five different media: brain heart infusion broth, Luria-Bertani broth, Mueller-Hinton broth, anaerobe basal broth, and anaerobic medium base (AMB). After in vitro fermentation, the gut microbiota and metabolites were analyzed at different culture times. The results showed that different culture media have different effects on the bacterial community structure and metabolites. The integrative analysis of gut microbiota and metabolism also proved that AMB medium is effective in keeping a stable bacterial community structure and producing less metabolites and short-chain fatty acids by simulating the nutrient-poor microenvironment in the human gut during in vitro fermentation. Thus, culturing with AMB medium for 48 h is the most suitable in vitro model for human gut microbiota fermentation, which provides an alternative approach for diet and health research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available