Journal
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 296, Issue -, Pages 418-427Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.100
Keywords
Depression; Comorbidity pattern; Network analysis; Physical comorbidity; Mental comorbidity
Categories
Funding
- Key Research and Development Project of Sichuan Province [2018SZ0114, 2019YFS0271, 2020YFS0428]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the comorbid status of depression among patients with chronic diseases using network analysis. Depressed patients had on average 4 comorbidities, and 84.4% had at least one. The comorbidity network in depression cases was more complex than controls, with intricate but distinct communities present within the network.
Background: Depression is a psychiatric disorder with a high comorbidity burden; however, previous comorbidity studies predominately focused on a few common diseases and relied on self-reported data. We aimed to investigate the comorbid status of depression concerning the entire spectrum of chronic diseases using network analysis. Method: Totally, 22,872 depressed inpatients and one-to-one matched controls were enrolled in the retrospective study. Hospital discharge records were aggregated to measure the comorbidities, where those with a prevalence >= 1% were selected for further analysis. Based on the co-occurrence frequency, sex- and age-specific comorbidity networks in depressed patients were constructed and the results were compared with the controls. Louvain algorithm was used to detect the highly interlinked communities. Results: Depressed patients had 4 comorbidities on average, and 84.4% had at least one comorbidity. The comorbidity network in depression cases was more complex than controls (connections of 839 vs. 369). Intricate but distinct communities appeared within the comorbidity network in depressed patients, where the largest community included cerebrovascular diseases, chronic ischaemia heart disease, atherosclerosis and osteoporosis. Sex-specific central diseases existed, and cardiovascular diseases were the major central diseases to both gender. The older the depressed patients, the more severe the central diseases in the comorbidity network. Limitations: The causality of the observed interactions could not be determined. Conclusions: The application of network analysis on longitudinal healthcare datasets to assess comorbidity patterns can supplement the traditional clinical study approaches. The findings would improve our understanding of depression-related comorbidities and enhance the integrated management of depression.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available