4.4 Article

A day on the shore: Ecological impacts of non-motorised recreational activities in and around inland water bodies

Journal

JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126073

Keywords

Literature review; Recreation; Ecological impacts; Freshwater

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01LC1826E]
  2. BMBF
  3. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) within the BAGGERSEE-Projekt
  4. Landesverband Sachsischer Angler e.V.
  5. Landesfischereiverband Bayern e.V.
  6. Angler Association of Lower Saxony within the STORBAGGER-project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review highlights the ecological impacts of recreational activities in and around inland water bodies, focusing on walking, birds, and plants. It reveals that plants are more susceptible to damage compared to animals, and highlights the need for different management strategies for mobile and sessile organisms.
With the increasing importance of recreational activities in and around inland water bodies, there is a need for sound knowledge about their ecological impacts. This narrative review summarizes and analyses the ecological effects of the land-based activities walking, biking, nature observing and relaxing on the shoreline as well as the water-based activities swimming, snorkelling, scuba diving, and canyoning. Searching multiple databases with standardized search terms retrieved twenty-six publications for further analyses. While walking was the most studied activity, birds were the most studied organism group, with a focus on individual time budgets and avoidance behaviour. Population-level analyses were exceedingly rare. The most frequently studied activityeffect combinations were walking and birds, walking and terrestrial plants and scuba diving/snorkelling and fishes. Aquatic plants, amphibians, reptiles, water chemical parameters and terrestrial and aquatic algae were underrepresented in the existing literature. No study on mammals was identified. Disturbance often led to temporary behavioural changes of birds and wildlife. Plants were more strongly impacted than animals, suffering from recreation-induced damage and dieback, which led to changes in community composition. The difference in intensity of impact between mobile and sessile organisms calls for different management strategies, depending on local conservation targets. Future studies should focus on underrepresented taxonomic groups and study population or community-level impacts, to collectively provide the sound scientific basis for the sustainable recreational use of inland water bodies, while minimizing or avoiding severe ecological impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available