4.4 Article

COX-2 inhibitors show no preventive effect in the development of skin cancer

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14649

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Career Development Award of Dermatology Foundation [CA186107, CA167552, CA176726, CA198216]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some clinical trials have found that the use of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors may lower the risk of skin cancer in high-risk groups. However, this study suggests that the use of COX-2 inhibitors is associated with a slightly increased risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) but not statistically significant for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and melanoma.
Background: Some clinical trials found that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor use lowered the risk of skin cancer in high-risk groups. Patients and Methods: To determine whether COX-2 inhibitor use is associated with lower risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and melanoma, we analyzed COX-2 inhibitor use and risk of skin cancer based on three prospective cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHS II, and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, including 153,882 participants. Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of COX-2 inhibitor use with risk of BCC, cSCC, and melanoma were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. We pooled the results using a fixed effects model. Results: 16,142 BCC, 1,973 cSCC, and 631 melanoma cases were documented. Ever vs. never use of COX-2 inhibitor was associated with a modestly increased risk of BCC (multivariable HR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.05-1.14). The hazard ratio was similar for cSCC (multivariable HR 1.12, 95 % CI 1.00-1.27) and melanoma (multivariable HR 1.10, 95 % CI 0.89-1.38), but was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Ever use of COX-2 inhibitor was not associated with a decreased skin cancer risk but was instead associated with a modest, increased risk of BCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available