4.3 Article

Electrodeposition of ZnS and evaluation of its electrochemical property

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 61, Issue SC, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.35848/1347-4065/ac571f

Keywords

zinc sulfide; electrodeposition; surface chemical structure; photocatalyst

Funding

  1. Nanotechnology Platform Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  2. Iketani Science and Technology Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cu-doped ZnS was synthesized as a new photocatalyst material by electrodeposition. Different electrolytic baths containing metal ions and various complexing agents were used for synthesis. It was found that ZnS could be successfully synthesized from all electrolytic baths tested except that using malonic acid as a complexing agent. However, metallic Zn was also observed in the ZnS deposits, leading to a decrease in the band gap energy.
Cu-doped ZnS was synthesized as a new photocatalyst material by electrodeposition. We attempted to synthesize ZnS using electrolytic baths containing metal ions and various complexing agents, i.e. tartaric acid, citric acid, triethanolamine (TEA), and disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA-2Na). The crystalline properties, binding conditions, surface morphology, and chemical composition of the samples were examined by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive spectrometry, respectively. ZnS was synthesized from all electrolytic baths examined except that using malonic acid as a complexing agent. However, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy suggested that metallic Zn was also present in the ZnS deposits. The band gap energy of ZnS prepared using EDTA as a complexing agent ranged from 3.4 to 3.5 eV, lower than the value of 3.6 eV for pure ZnS, indicating that metallic Zn present in the ZnS deposit reduced the band gap energy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available