4.7 Article

Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation and User Scheduling for Collaborative Mobile Clouds With Hybrid Receivers

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 12, Pages 9834-9846

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2016.2525821

Keywords

Collaborative mobile clouds (CMCs); content distribution; green communications; power allocation; resource allocation; subchannel allocation; user cooperation; user scheduling

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [284748, 288473]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB316001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61461136004]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [284748, 288473, 284748, 288473] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we study the resource allocation and user scheduling algorithm for minimizing the energy cost of data transmission in the context of orthogonal frequency-division multiple-access (OFDMA) collaborative mobile clouds (CMCs) with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer receivers. The CMC, which consists of several collaborating mobile terminals, offers one potential solution for downlink content distribution and for energy consumption (EC) reduction. Previous work on the design of the CMC system mainly focused on cloud formulation or energy efficiency (EE) investigation, whereas how to allocate the radio resource and schedule user transmission has not gotten much attention. With the objective of minimizing system EC, an optimization problem that jointly considers subchannel assignment, power allocation, and user scheduling has been presented. We propose different algorithms to address the formulated problem based on the convex optimization technique. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed user scheduling and resource allocation algorithms can achieve significant EE performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available