4.4 Article

Bladder cancer biomarker screening based on non-targeted urine metabolomics

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 23-29

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-03080-6

Keywords

Bladder cancer; Metabolomics; Liquid chromatography; Biomarker

Funding

  1. Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University
  2. Xiamen University School of Medicine
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21535007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to analyze the urine of bladder cancer patients and cancer-free controls, and identified significant differences in 27 metabolites between the two groups. The results suggest that non-invasive clinical diagnoses of bladder cancer may be possible through the use of these candidate biomarkers identified in the study.
Purpose Bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the urinary system, and its screening relies heavily on invasive cystoscopy, which increases the risk of urethral injury and infection. This study aims to use non-targeted metabolomics methods to screen for metabolites that are significantly different between the urine of bladder cancer patients and cancer-free controls. Methods In this study, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to analyze the urine of bladder cancer patients (n = 57) and the cancer-free controls (n = 38) by non-targeted metabolomic analysis and metabolite identification. Results The results showed that there were significant differences in the expression of 27 metabolites between bladder cancer patients and the cancer-free controls. Conclusion In the multivariate statistical analysis of this study, the urinary metabolic profile data of bladder cancer patients were analyzed, and the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that it is possible to perform non-invasive clinical diagnoses of bladder cancer through these candidate biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available