4.3 Article

Enhancement of Pool Boiling Heat Transfer Performance of R-134a on Microporous Al@GNPs Composite Coatings

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-022-02973-7

Keywords

Graphene nanoplatelets; Heat transfer coefficient; R-134a; Pool boiling; Porous media

Funding

  1. DST-FIST [SR/FST/ETI-391/2015(c)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, graphene nanoplatelets reinforced Al matrix composite coatings were fabricated and applied to investigate the pool boiling heat transfer performance. The results showed that the heat transfer coefficient of the Al@GNPs composite coated heating surface was 143% higher than that of the plain Al heating surface.
Pool boiling has been widely employed in electronic, power production and refrigeration systems due to its high efficiency in heat transfer. However, the investigation and application of microporous Al matrix composite coatings to enhance the pool boiling heat transfer (BHT) are very limited. In this study, graphene nanoplatelets reinforced Al matrix (Al@GNPs) composite coatings are fabricated by combining mechanical milling, screen printing and sintering techniques to investigate the pool boiling heat transfer using R-134 as working fluid. The experimental data were obtained at a saturation temperature of 10 degrees C for heat fluxes ranging from 9.04 kW center dot m(-2) to 73.57 kW center dot m(-2). The effect of various coating thicknesses on boiling characteristics and heat transfer coefficient (HTC) of R-134a were studied and presented in detail. Our results demonstrate that the HTC obtained for Al@GNPs-4 composite coated heating surface is 143% higher than the plain Al heating surface. Enhanced nucleation sites and increased bubble pumping action are the main reasons for the augmented BHT performance on the Al@GNPs composite coated heating surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available