Experimental investigation on the performance of hybrid Fe3O4 coated MWCNT/Water nanofluid as a coolant of a Plate heat exchanger

The performance of MWCNT + Fe3O4/water hybrid nanofluids as the coolant of a plate heat exchanger is experimentally investigated for particle concentrations in the range from 0.05 to 0.3 vol % and for coolant flow rate from 3 to 7 lit/min. The hybrid MWCNT + Fe3O4 nanoparticles were prepared by the chemical precipitation method and characterized with XRD, SEM, Raman, and VSM techniques. The thermal conductivity, viscosity, density and specific heat of MWCNT + Fe3O4 hybrid nanofluid was measured experimentally and compared with the literature values. The results show that the exergy efficiency of the hybrid nanofluid is 10.5% higher than that of de-ionized water at flow rate of 7 lit/min and particles concentration of 0.3 vol %. Thermal performance factor is found to be greater than 1 for the hybrid nanofluids (0.05-0.3 vol %), with its maximal value of 1.12 occurs at 0.3 vol % and flow rate of 7 lit/min. The effectiveness of 0.3 vol % nanofluid is higher than the deionized water by 11.65% at the flow rate of 3 lit/min and by 13.21% at 7 lit/min. The number of transfer units of 0.3 vol % hybrid nanofluid is higher than that of de-ionized water by 20.88% and 24.29% at flow rates of 3 and 7 lit/min, respectively. A tradeoff between the first and operating costs suggest that operating at a coolant flow rate of 5 lpm will yield the lowest cost. Therefore, benefits of reducing the size and enhancing heat transfer of the PHE via the use of MWCNT + Fe3O4/water hybrid nanofluid outweigh the additional power requirement.

Automated summary

Experimental investigation of MWCNT + Fe3O4/water hybrid nanofluids as a coolant for a plate heat exchanger showed improved exergy efficiency, thermal performance factor, and effectiveness compared to de-ionized water, indicating the potential for enhancing heat transfer efficiency. The study also revealed a tradeoff between flow rate and cost, suggesting that operating at 5 lpm would be the most cost-effective option.