4.7 Article

Fault-tolerant control of an aerial manipulator with guaranteed tracking performance

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.5863

Keywords

aerial manipulators; backstepping technique; extended state observer; nonsingular terminal sliding mode control; prescribed performance function

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1309202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52175097]
  3. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems [GZKF-201915]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a fault-tolerant control scheme for an aerial manipulator, ensuring tracking performance under actuator faults through the use of a novel performance function, backstepping technique, and sliding mode control for stability, with simulations demonstrating effectiveness.
In this article, a fault-tolerant control (FTC) scheme of an aerial manipulator is proposed, which can guarantee the transient and steady-state tracking performance under actuator faults. A novel performance function (NPF) with simple form and explicit terminal time is designed to constrain the tracking errors. First, backstepping technique combined with the NPF is adopted as control framework to guarantee the asymptotic stability. Then, adaptive nonsingular terminal sliding mode with estimated actuator faults is used as the robust controller to deal with actuator fault. Finally, extended state observer is used to estimate and compensate complex coupling effects between the main-body UAV and loading manipulator, and external disturbance. The stability of the aerial manipulator system with actuator faults and external disturbance is proved by Lyapunov analysis. Besides, the effect of the turbulent wind field on the body of the vehicle is analyzed. Several comparative simulations are carried out to show the effectiveness of the proposed FTC scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available