4.5 Article

Drop-in analysis of R450A and R513A as low-GWP alternatives to R134a in a water-to-water heat pump

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages 139-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.12.007

Keywords

COP; Heat pump; Heating capacity; R450A; R513A

Funding

  1. MIUR through the program PRIN 2015 [2015M8S2PA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the experimental analysis results of using R450A and R513A as drop-in alternatives to R134a in a water-to-water heat pump. Compared to R134a, the use of R450A leads to a reduction in capacity and COP, while the use of R513A results in variations in heating capacity and COP. The paper also discusses the increase in rotational frequency of the compressor shaft to restore heating capacity.
This paper discusses the results of an experimental analysis of the use of R450A and R513A as drop-in alter-natives to R134a in a water-to-water heat pump. The heat pump is tested setting the rotational frequency of the compressor shaft, the vapour superheating at the evaporator outlet and the mass flow rates and temperatures of the secondary fluids at the heat exchangers outlets to the desired conditions. Compared to R134a, the use of R450A leads to a capacity reduction, that lays in the range 6.59% to 15.02%, and to a COP variation, that is within the range -2.48% to +2.99%, whereas with R513A the variations of the heating capacity and COP lay in the range -8.78% to +3.16% and -7.48% to +2.22% respectively. The increase in the rotational frequency of the compressor shaft to bring the heating capacity back to the R134a values is discussed too. The required in-crease is in the range 10% to 16% with R450A and 2% to 8% with R513A, but a COP reduction in the range 0.14% to 5.22% with the former refrigerant and 2.34% to 6.48% with the latter consequently arises.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available