4.7 Article

Effect of different fillers on the microstructural evolution and high temperature oxidation resistance of Mo-Si-B coatings prepared by pack cementation

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2021.105625

Keywords

Filler; Mo-Si-B coating; Pack cementation; Oxidation resistance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China [51701077]
  2. Fujian Natural Science Foundation [2017 J05082]
  3. Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University [ZQN-PY505]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mo-Si-B coatings were prepared on molybdenum using pack cementation process with different fillers affecting microstructural evolution and high temperature oxidation kinetics. The coatings consisted of MoSi2 layer and MoB transitional layer, while oxidation resulted in three-layer structure of SiO2 film, Mo5Si3 layer, and MoSi2 layer. SiO2 filler reduced weight gain and consumption of MoSi2 layer during oxidation.
Mo-Si-B coatings were prepared on molybdenum by a pack cementation process. The effects of Al2O3, SiO2, and SiC fillers on the microstructural evolution and high temperature oxidation kinetic of Mo-Si-B coatings were studied. All the three Mo-Si-B coatings were composed of a MoSi2 layer and a MoB transitional layer. The thickness of the transitional layers showed no discernable differences in different coatings, but the coating prepared with the SiC filler showed the thickest MoSi2 outer layer owing to the additional silicon source supplied by the SiC pack agent. After oxidation at 1250 degrees C for 100 h, the oxidized coatings exhibited a three-layer structure consisting of an outer SiO2 film, a middle Mo5Si3 layer and an inner MoSi2 layer. The coating prepared with the SiO2 filler showed the smallest weight gain and consumption of the MoSi2 layer, which may be due to the residual SiO2 pack agent favoring the rapid formation of a dense SiO2 film.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available