4.5 Article

Mortality from leukemia, cancer and heart disease among US nuclear power plant workers, 1957-2011

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 657-678

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1967507

Keywords

Epidemiology; Million Person (Worker) Study; nuclear power plant workers; leukemia and cancer; heart disease

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0008944]
  2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
  3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  6. Department of Energy [DE-AU0000042, DE-AU0000046]
  7. NRC [NRC-HQ-60-14-G-0011]
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5UE1EH000989, 5NUE1EH001315]
  9. NASA [NNX15AU88G, 80NSSC17M0016]
  10. Vanderbilt-lngram Cancer Center [404-357-9682]
  11. [N00024-17-C-4322]
  12. NASA [796670, NNX15AU88G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Million Person Study of Low-Dose Health Effects aims to examine the radiation risk for chronic exposures received gradually over time among nuclear power plant workers. Prolonged exposure to radiation was found to increase the risk of leukemia other than CLL among NPP workers, but there was little evidence for a radiation association with all solid cancers, lung cancer, or ischemic heart disease. Increased precision is expected as different cohorts within the MPS are combined for analysis.
Background The aim of the Million Person Study of Low-Dose Health Effects (MPS) is to examine the level of radiation risk for chronic exposures received gradually over time and not acutely as was the case for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Nuclear power plant (NPP) workers comprise nearly 15 percent of the MPS. Leukemia, selected cancers, Parkinson's disease, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and other causes of death are evaluated. Methods and material The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS) and the Landauer, Inc. dosimetry databases identified 135,193 NPP workers first monitored 1957-1984. Annual personal dose equivalents [Hp(10)] were available for each worker. Radiation records from all places of employment were sought. Vital status was determined through 2011. Mean absorbed doses to red bone marrow (RBM), esophagus, lung, colon, brain and heart were estimated by adjusting the recorded Hp(10) for each worker by scaling factors, accounting for exposure geometry and energy of the incident gamma radiation. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated. Radiation risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Nearly 50% of workers were employed for more than 20 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 30.2 y. Overall, 29,124 total deaths occurred, 296 from leukemia other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 3382 from lung cancer, 140 from Parkinson's disease and 5410 from IHD. The mean dose to RBM was 37.9 mGy (maximum 1.0 Gy; percent >100 mGy was 9.2%), 43.2 mGy to lung, 43.7 mGy to colon, 33.2 mGy to brain, and 43.9 mGy to heart. The SMRs (95% CI) were 1.06 (0.94; 1.19) for leukemia other than CLL, 1.10 (1.07; 1.14) for lung cancer, 0.90 (0.76; 1.06) for Parkinson's disease, and 0.80 (0.78; 0.82) for IHD. The excess relative risk (ERR) per 100 mGy for leukemia other than CLL was 0.15 (90% CI -0.001; 0.31). For all solid cancers the ERR per 100 mGy (95% CI) was 0.01 (-0.03; 0.05), for lung cancer -0.04 (-0.11; 0.02), for Parkinson's disease 0.24 (-0.02; 0.50), and for IHD -0.01 (-0.06; 0.04). Conclusion Prolonged exposure to radiation increased the risk of leukemia other than CLL among NPP workers. There was little evidence for a radiation association for all solid cancers, lung cancer or ischemic heart disease. Increased precision will be forthcoming as the different cohorts within the MPS are combined, such as industrial radiographers and medical radiation workers who were assembled and evaluated in like manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available