4.5 Review

Irradiation affects the structural, cellular and molecular components of jawbones

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 136-147

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2013568

Keywords

Bone; ionizing radiation; inflammation; molecular biology; microenvironment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiation can have detrimental effects on bone at structural, cellular, vascular, and molecular levels, increasing the risk of damage to surrounding healthy tissues and the risk of fracture. Technological advances and research on animal models and human bone tissue studies have provided insights into how bone is affected by different doses of radiation.
Purpose Emerging evidence shows that changes in the bone and its microenvironment following radiotherapy are associated with either an inhibition or a state of low bone formation. Ionizing radiation is damaging to the jawbone as it increases the complication rate due to the development of hypovascular, hypocellular, and hypoxic tissue. This review summarizes and correlates the current knowledge on the effects of irradiation on the bone with an emphasis on jawbone, as these have been a less extensively studied area. Conclusions The stringent regulation of bone formation and bone resorption can be influenced by radiation, causing detrimental effects at structural, cellular, vascular, and molecular levels. It is also associated with a high risk of damage to surrounding healthy tissues and an increased risk of fracture. Technological advances and research on animal models as well as a few human bone tissue studies have provided novel insights into the ways in which bone can be affected by high, low and sublethal dose of radiation. The influence of radiation on bone metabolism, cellular properties, vascularity, collagen, and other factors like inflammation, reactive oxygen species are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available