4.5 Article

212Pb-conjugated anti-rat HER2/neu antibody against a neu-N derived murine mammary carcinoma cell line: cell kill and RBE in vitro

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages 1452-1461

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2033341

Keywords

Alpha particle; LET radiation; RBE; radiosensitivity

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 CA116477]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The RBE of a Pb-212-conjugated anti-HER2/neu antibody construct was evaluated in this study using a colony formation assay. The results showed that the radiolabeled antibody had a high RBE at 37% survival, and the unbound antibody had minimal radiation to cells.
Purpose: In the current work, the RBE of a Pb-212-conjugated anti-HER2/neu antibody construct has been evaluated, in vitro, by colony formation assay. The RBE was estimated by comparing two absorbed dose-survival curves: the first obtained from the conjugated Pb-212 experiments (test radiation), the second obtained by parallel experiments of single bolus irradiation of external beam (reference radiation). Materials and Methods: Mammary carcinoma NT2.5 cells were treated with (0-3.70) kBq/ml of radiolabeled antibody. Nonspecific binding was assessed with addition of excess amount of unlabeled antibody. The colony formation curves were converted from activity concentration to cell nucleus absorbed dose by simulating the decay and transport of all daughter and secondary particles of Pb-212, using the Monte Carlo code GEANT 4. Results: The radiolabeled antibody yielded an RBE of 8.3 at 37% survival and a survival independent RBE (i.e. RBE2) of 9.9. Unbound/untargeted Pb-212-labeled antibody, as obtained in blocking experiments yielded minimal alpha-particle radiation to cells. Conclusions: These results further highlight the importance of specific targeting toward achieving tumor cell kill and low toxicity to normal tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available