4.4 Article

The acute exercise-cognition interaction: From the catecholamines hypothesis to an interoception model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 75-88

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.10.005

Keywords

Anterior cingulate cortex; Insula cortex; Effort cost; Locus coeruleus; Motivation; Orbitofrontal cortex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interoception feedback during exercise can affect the release of catecholamines in the brain, impacting cognitive performance. When exercise intensity reaches maximum, cognitive performance is influenced by the interaction between motivation, perceived effort costs, and perceived availability of resources.
An interoception model for the acute exercise-cognition interaction is presented. During exercise following the norepinephrine threshold, interoceptive feedback induces increased tonic release of extracellular catecholamines, facilitating phasic release hence better cognitive performance of executive functions. When exercise intensity increases to maximum, the nature of task-induced norepinephrine release from the locus coeruleus is dependent on interaction between motivation, perceived effort costs and perceived availability of resources. This is controlled by interaction between the rostral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula cortex. If perceived available resources are sufficient to meet predicted effort costs and reward value is high, tonic release from the locus coeruleus is attenuated thus facilitating phasic release, therefore cognition is not inhibited. However, if perceived available resources are insufficient to meet predicted effort costs or reward value is low, tonic release from the locus coeruleus is induced, attenuating phasic release. As a result, cognition is inhibited, although long-term memory and tasks that require switching to new stimuli-response couplings are probably facilitated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available