4.5 Article

Buckling performance of egg-shaped shells fabricated through free hydroforming

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104435

Keywords

Egg-shaped shell; Free hydroforming; External pressure; Buckling capacity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52071160, 52071203]
  2. Excellent Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190103]
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province [KTHY068]
  4. Natural Science Research of Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province [19KJA530002]
  5. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Marine Renewable Energy [19DZ2254800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the performance and external pressure-supporting capacities of egg-shaped shells fabricated through free hydroforming. Experimental and numerical evaluations revealed that the shells exhibited adequate external pressure-supporting capacities. Overall, the research demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of using free hydroforming to create egg-shaped shells with desired properties.
This study investigated the performance and external pressure-supporting capacities of egg-shaped shells fabricated through free hydroforming. Nine preforms (length: 256 mm; width: 178 mm) were fabricated from thin-walled stainless plates (nominal thickness: 0.86 mm), eight of which were internally bulged into egg-shaped shells at various hydroforming pressure levels. Their geometric properties were optically and ultrasonically measured before and after hydroforming. Subsequently, all samples were hydrostatically destroyed through pressurization to evaluate their ultimate strength and destruction modes. Internal hydroforming and external pressurization were numerically (nonlinear) assessed. The experimental and numerical observations were consistent. The shells exhibited adequate external pressure-supporting capacities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available