4.7 Article

A Proximal Dual Consensus ADMM Method for Multi-Agent Constrained Optimization

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 64, Issue 14, Pages 3719-3734

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2016.2544743

Keywords

Distributed optimization; consensus optimization; alternating direction method of multipliers; polyhedron constraint

Funding

  1. NSFC, China [61571385]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers a convex optimization problem with a globally coupled linear equality constraint and local polyhedron constraints and develops efficient distributed optimization methods. The considered problem has many engineering applications. Due to the polyhedron constraints, agents in the existing methods have to deal with polyhedron constrained subproblems at each iteration. One of the key challenges is that projection onto a polyhedron set is not trivial, which prohibits the agents from solving these subproblems efficiently. In this paper, based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), we propose a new distributed optimization method, called proximal dual consensus ADMM (PDC-ADMM). The PDC-ADMM transforms the polyhedron constraints as quadratic penalty terms in the subproblems, making the subproblems efficiently solvable and consequently reducing the overall computational overhead of the agents. In addition, we propose a randomized PDC-ADMM which can deal with time-varying networks with randomly ON/OFF agents and communication errors, and an inexact (randomized) PDC-ADMM for low-complexity computations. We show that the proposed distributed methods converge to the optimal solution set almost surely and have a O(1/k) ergodic convergence rate in the mean. Numerical results show that the proposed methods offer significantly lower computation time than the existing distributed ADMM method in solving a linearly constrained LASSO problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available