4.5 Article

BMI metrics and their association with adiposity, cardiometabolic risk factors, and biomarkers in children and adolescents

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 359-365

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41366-021-01006-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR000114]
  2. National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2TR002492, UL1TR002494]
  3. [R01-HL110957]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that %BMIp95 and %BMIp50 were the most strongly correlated with measures of adiposity in youth, while BMIp consistently had the lowest correlations.
Background There are limited data comparing the relative associations of various BMI metrics with adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors in youth. Objective Examine correlations of 7 different BMI metrics with adiposity, cardiometabolic risk factors, and biomarkers (i.e. blood pressure, waist circumference, cholesterol, leptin, insulin, high molecular weight adiponectin, high-sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP)). Methods This was a cross-sectional analysis of youth in all BMI categories. BMI metrics: BMI z-score (BMIz), extended BMIz (ext.BMIz), BMI percentile (BMIp), percent of the BMI 95th percentile (%BMIp95), percent of the BMI median (%BMIp50), triponderal mass index (TMI), and BMI (BMI). Correlations between these BMI metrics and adiposity, visceral adiposity, cardiometabolic risk factors and biomarkers were summarized using Pearson's correlations. Results Data from 371 children and adolescents ages 8-21 years old were included in our analysis: 52% were female; 20.2% with Class I obesity, 20.5% with Class II, and 14.3% with Class III obesity. BMIp consistently demonstrated lower correlations with adiposity, risk factors, and biomarkers (r = 0.190-0.768) than other BMI metrics. The %BMIp95 and %BMIp50 were marginally more strongly correlated with measures of adiposity as compared to other BMI metrics. The ext.BMIz did not meaningfully outperform BMIz. Conclusion Out of all the BMI metrics evaluated, %BMIp95 and %BMIp50 were the most strongly correlated with measures of adiposity. %BMIp95 has the benefit of being used currently to define obesity and severe obesity in both clinical and research settings. BMIp consistently had the lowest correlations. Future research should evaluate the longitudinal stability of various BMI metrics and their relative associations with medium to long-term changes in adiposity and cardiometabolic outcomes in the context of intervention trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available