4.7 Article

Tiled Sparse Coding in Eigenspaces for Image Classification

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0129065722500071

Keywords

Computer-aided diagnosis; medical imaging; machine learning; deep learning; sparse coding; dictionary; pneumonia; COVID-19

Funding

  1. FEDER Una manera de hacer Europa [RTI2018-098913-B100]
  2. Consejeria de Economia, Innovacion, Ciencia y Empleo (Junta de Andalucia)
  3. FEDER [CV20-45250, A-TIC-080-UGR18, B-TIC-586UGR20, P20-00525]
  4. [MCIN/AEI/10. 13039/5011000110331]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a classification framework for medical image diagnosis based on sparse coding, which successfully distinguishes between different pathological types and achieves excellent performance in a real context.
The automation in the diagnosis of medical images is currently a challenging task. The use of Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems can be a powerful tool for clinicians, especially in situations when hospitals are overflowed. These tools are usually based on artificial intelligence (AI), a field that has been recently revolutionized by deep learning approaches. These alternatives usually obtain a large performance based on complex solutions, leading to a high computational cost and the need of having large databases. In this work, we propose a classification framework based on sparse coding. Images are first partitioned into different tiles, and a dictionary is built after applying PCA to these tiles. The original signals are then transformed as a linear combination of the elements of the dictionary. Then, they are reconstructed by iteratively deactivating the elements associated with each component. Classification is finally performed employing as features the subsequent reconstruction errors. Performance is evaluated in a real context where distinguishing between four different pathologies: control versus bacterial pneumonia versus viral pneumonia versus COVID-19. Our system differentiates between pneumonia patients and controls with an accuracy of 97.74%, whereas in the 4-class context the accuracy is 86.73%. The excellent results and the pioneering use of sparse coding in this scenario evidence that our proposal can assist clinicians when their workload is high.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available