4.7 Review

Microbiota Alterations and Their Association with Oncogenomic Changes in Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312978

Keywords

pancreatic cancer; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; microbiota; dysbiosis; oncogenomics; mutations; inflammation; drug response; bacterial metabolites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic cancer and the microbiota have complex interactions, with the microbiota playing a significant role in the development of pancreatic cancer, although the mechanisms are not completely clear. Dysbiosis may lead to the development of pancreatic cancer by altering host metabolism and immune responses. Additionally, the microbiota may also influence the efficacy of pancreatic cancer treatments.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive disease with a high mortality and poor prognosis. The human microbiome is a key factor in many malignancies, having the ability to alter host metabolism and immune responses and participate in tumorigenesis. Gut microbes have an influence on physiological functions of the healthy pancreas and are themselves controlled by pancreatic secretions. An altered oral microbiota may colonize the pancreas and cause local inflammation by the action of its metabolites, which may lead to carcinogenesis. The mechanisms behind dysbiosis and PC development are not completely clear. Herein, we review the complex interactions between PC tumorigenesis and the microbiota, and especially the question, whether and how an altered microbiota induces oncogenomic changes, or vice versa, whether cancer mutations have an impact on microbiota composition. In addition, the role of the microbiota in drug efficacy in PC chemo- and immunotherapies is discussed. Possible future scenarios are the intentional manipulation of the gut microbiota in combination with therapy or the utilization of microbial profiles for the noninvasive screening and monitoring of PC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available