4.7 Article

GLIS1 in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Regulates the Migration and Invasion of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042218

Keywords

ovarian cancer; cancer-associated fibroblast; reprogramming; metastasis; GLIS1

Funding

  1. Korean Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health Welfare [HI16C1559]
  2. Korean government [NRF-2015-R1A2A2A01005197]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified that CAFs in ovarian serous carcinomas support migration and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells through the overexpression of GLIS1. Knockdown of GLIS1 in CAFs significantly inhibited the migration and invasion abilities of OC cells, indicating GLIS1 in CAFs may be a potential therapeutic target to inhibit OC metastasis.
A cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the most important players that modulate tumor aggressiveness. In this study, we aimed to identify CAF-related genes in ovarian serous carcinomas (OSC) that account for the high incidence and mortality of ovarian cancers (OCs) and to develop therapeutic targets for tumor microenvironment modulation. Here, we performed a microarray analysis of CAFs isolated from three metastatic and three nonmetastatic OSC tissues and compared their gene expression profiles. Among the genes increased in metastatic CAFs (mCAFs), GLIS1 (Glis Family Zinc Finger 1) showed a significant increase in both the gene mRNA and protein expression levels. Knockdown of GLIS1 in mCAFs significantly inhibited migration, invasion, and wound healing ability of OC cells. In addition, an in vivo study demonstrated that knockdown of GLIS1 in CAFs reduced peritoneal metastasis. Taken together, these results suggest that CAFs support migration and metastasis of OC cells by GLIS1 overexpression. It also indicates GLIS1 in CAFs might be a potential therapeutic target to inhibit OC metastasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available