4.7 Review

Correlation between Oxidative Stress and Transforming Growth Factor-Beta in Cancers

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413181

Keywords

reactive oxygen species; transforming growth factor-beta; tumorigenesis; metastasis; cancer

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MEST) [NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025124, NRF- 2020R1I1A1A01069013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling pathway plays a critical role in tumor development and progression. While ROS can influence TGF-beta signaling, the TGF-beta pathway can regulate ROS production, leading to a complex relationship between the two in cancer cells. Understanding this crosstalk may provide new insights and potential approaches in cancer biology.
The downregulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) facilitates precancerous tumor development, even though increasing the level of ROS can promote metastasis. The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling pathway plays an anti-tumorigenic role in the initial stages of cancer development but a pro-tumorigenic role in later stages that fosters cancer metastasis. TGF-beta can regulate the production of ROS unambiguously or downregulate antioxidant systems. ROS can influence TGF-beta signaling by enhancing its expression and activation. Thus, TGF-beta signaling and ROS might significantly coordinate cellular processes that cancer cells employ to expedite their malignancy. In cancer cells, interplay between oxidative stress and TGF-beta is critical for tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Thus, both TGF-beta and ROS can develop a robust relationship in cancer cells to augment their malignancy. This review focuses on the appropriate interpretation of this crosstalk between TGF-beta and oxidative stress in cancer, exposing new potential approaches in cancer biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available