4.7 Review

Molecular Effectors of Photodynamic Therapy-Mediated Resistance to Cancer Cells

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413182

Keywords

cancer cells; drug resistance; photodynamic therapy; autophagy

Funding

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa [98337]
  3. African Laser Centre (ALC)
  4. University of Johannesburg
  5. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  6. Council for Scientific and industrial Research (CSIR)-National Laser Centre (NLC) Laser Rental Pool Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photodynamic therapy is a promising experimental research subject for treating resistant cancers, but faces challenges such as tumor relapse and drug resistance. Understanding the molecular mechanisms behind PDT resistance is crucial for developing effective cancer treatments.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is currently enjoying considerable attention as the subject of experimental research to treat resistant cancers. The preferential accumulation of a non-toxic photosensitizer (PS) in different cellular organelles that causes oxidative damage by combining light and molecular oxygen leads to selective cell killing. However, one major setback, common among other treatment approaches, is tumor relapse and the development of resistance causing treatment failure. PDT-mediated resistance could result from increased drug efflux and decreased localization of PS, reduced light exposure, increased DNA damage repair, and altered expression of survival genes. This review highlights the essential insights of PDT reports in which PDT resistance was observed and which identified some of the molecular effectors that facilitate the development of PDT resistance. We also discuss different perceptions of PDT and how its current limitations can be overturned to design improved cancer resistant treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available