4.7 Article

Drug Repurposing in Rare Diseases: An Integrative Study of Drug Screening and Transcriptomic Analysis in Nephropathic Cystinosis

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312829

Keywords

cystinosis; drug repositioning; high throughput screening; transcriptome; high content screening

Funding

  1. Cystinosis Research Foundation [CRFS-2011]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health
  3. Telethon [TGM11CB1]
  4. Italian Association for Cancer Research [IG2013_14761]
  5. European Research Council [670881]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [670881] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses a drug repurposing strategy for nephropathic cystinosis, a rare inherited disorder, using mechanism-based and cell-based screenings coupled with computational analysis to predict therapeutic responses. Through comparing gene-expression signatures of drugs and the disease, potential drugs and metabolic pathways relevant to the pathophysiology were identified.
Diagnosis and cure for rare diseases represent a great challenge for the scientific community who often comes up against the complexity and heterogeneity of clinical picture associated to a high cost and time-consuming drug development processes. Here we show a drug repurposing strategy applied to nephropathic cystinosis, a rare inherited disorder belonging to the lysosomal storage diseases. This approach consists in combining mechanism-based and cell-based screenings, coupled with an affordable computational analysis, which could result very useful to predict therapeutic responses at both molecular and system levels. Then, we identified potential drugs and metabolic pathways relevant for the pathophysiology of nephropathic cystinosis by comparing gene-expression signature of drugs that share common mechanisms of action or that involve similar pathways with the disease gene-expression signature achieved with RNA-seq.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available