4.7 Article

Engineering Efficient Self-Assembled Plasmonic Nanostructures by Configuring Metallic Nanoparticle's Morphology

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910595

Keywords

self-assembly; metallic nanoparticles; plasmonic modes; simulations; surface charge mappings; full-width three-quarter maximum

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2021R1I1A1A01050424, 2020R1I1A1A01069244, 2020R1A6A3A01095799, 2020R1A2C2011090]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1I1A1A01050424, 2020R1A6A3A01095799, 2020R1A2C2011090, 2020R1I1A1A01069244] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the significance of the shape and surface morphology of plasmonic nanoparticles in achieving efficient self-assembled plasmonic nanoparticle clusters. Spherical nanoparticles show better near-field strength and broad-spectral optical performance compared to cubical nanoparticles, attributed to their dipole mode characteristics.
We reveal the significance of plasmonic nanoparticle's (NP) shape and its surface morphology en route to an efficient self-assembled plasmonic nanoparticle cluster. A simplified model is simulated in the form of free-space dimer and trimer nanostructures (NPs in the shape of a sphere, cube, and disk). A ~200% to ~125% rise in near-field strength (gap mode enhancement) is observed for spherical NPs in comparison with cubical NPs (from 2 nm to 8 nm gap sizes). Full-width three-quarter maximum reveals better broad-spectral optical performance in a range of ~100 nm (dimer) and ~170 nm (trimer) from spherical NPs as compared to a cube (~60 nm for dimer and trimer). These excellent properties for sphere-based nanostructures are merited from its dipole mode characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available