4.7 Review

Lessons Learned from the Studies of Roots Shaded from Direct Root Illumination

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312784

Keywords

D-rootsystem; direct root illumination; root growth; reactive oxygen species; flavonols; abiotic stress; light escape mechanism; auxin; cytokinin; dark-grown roots

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic from European Regional Development Fund 'Centre for Experimental Plant Biology' [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 019/0000738]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Roots have evolved signaling pathways to adapt to changing environments, growing towards beneficial areas in soil while avoiding adverse conditions. Direct illumination of roots under experimental conditions alters their morphology, cellular and biochemical responses, reducing nutrient uptake and adaptability to stress stimuli.
The root is the below-ground organ of a plant, and it has evolved multiple signaling pathways that allow adaptation of architecture, growth rate, and direction to an ever-changing environment. Roots grow along the gravitropic vector towards beneficial areas in the soil to provide the plant with proper nutrients to ensure its survival and productivity. In addition, roots have developed escape mechanisms to avoid adverse environments, which include direct illumination. Standard laboratory growth conditions for basic research of plant development and stress adaptation include growing seedlings in Petri dishes on medium with roots exposed to light. Several studies have shown that direct illumination of roots alters their morphology, cellular and biochemical responses, which results in reduced nutrient uptake and adaptability upon additive stress stimuli. In this review, we summarize recent methods that allow the study of shaded roots under controlled laboratory conditions and discuss the observed changes in the results depending on the root illumination status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available