4.5 Article

Comparative study of multicomponent Lattice Boltzmann models for binary mixture flows

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0129183122500346

Keywords

Lattice Boltzmann method; binary mixtures; interspecies friction force; viscous diffusive mechanisms

Funding

  1. Collaborative Research and Training Experience program in Simulation-based Engineering Science [CREATE-481695-2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) models for binary mixture flows were compared numerically, and the results showed that the performance of the two models differs under the incompressible limit and has different influences on the flow behavior under different flow regimes.
Two lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) models for binary mixture flows are numerically compared. The first model solves the Navier-Stokes equations within the incompressible limit and considers the mixture as one single fluid. A multi relaxation time (MRT) collision operator tunes the fluid diffusivity independently of the fluid viscosity. The second model emerges from a different theoretical derivation of the kinetic theory, where the governing equations are recovered for each species of the mixture. A source term in the LBM defines the interspecies friction force and couples the species of the mixture. A pure diffusion flow and a 2D plane Poiseuille binary mixture flow verify both models in the incompressible limit where diffusive and viscous transport occurs. The influence of molecular mass ratio, dynamic viscosity ratio, and Schmidt number on species and mixture flow behavior is investigated. The numerical results show good agreement against their respective analytical solutions and capture the deviation between the velocity profiles according to the flow regime. The present numerical study underlines the difference between the models as a function of the flow regimes which was observed from the macroscopic governing equations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available