4.6 Article

Extraction of copper from copper-bearing biotite by ultrasonic-assisted leaching

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-020-2132-y

Keywords

ultrasonic wave; copper extraction; delamination; copper-bearing biotite

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51574018]
  2. China Nonferrous Metal Mining (Group) Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method of ultrasonic-assisted acid leaching for copper extraction from copper-bearing biotite is proposed and found to be more effective than regular acid leaching. It reduces leaching time, sulfuric acid concentration, and temperature, offering a promising approach for recycling valuable metals from phyllosilicate minerals.
Copper-bearing biotite is a refractory copper mineral found on the surface of the Zambian Copperbelt. Biotite is a copper oxide from which copper is extracted by various methods, especially by leaching. Leaching is the process of extracting a substance from a solid material dissolved in a liquid. To improve the efficiency of the leaching process by a more effective method, a new method called ultrasonic-assisted acid leaching is proposed and applied in this study. Compared with regular acid leaching, the ultrasound method reduced the leaching time from 120 to 40 min, and sulfuric acid concentration reduced from 0.5 to 0.3 mol center dot L-1. Besides, leaching temperature could be reduced from 75 to 45 degrees C at the leaching rate of 78%. The mechanism analysis indicates that an ultrasonic wave can cause the delamination of a copper-bearing biotite and increase its specific surface area from 0.55 to 1.67 m(2)center dot g(-1). The results indicate that copper extraction from copper-bearing biotite by ultrasonic-assisted acid leaching is more effective than regular acid leaching. This study proposes a promising method for recycling valuable metals from phyllosilicate minerals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available