4.7 Article

Analysis of finite element and finite volume methods for fluid-structure interaction simulation of blood flow in a real stenosed artery

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106650

Keywords

Fluid-structure interaction; Blood flow; Patient-specific; Stenosed artery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the finite element and finite volume methods for simulating fluid-structure interaction in a stenosed artery, finding reasonable agreement between the predicted hemodynamics of both approaches. The finite volume method (Ansys) was shown to be more efficient in terms of computational time and memory requirements.
This paper presents a qualitative and quantitative comparison between the finite element and the finite volume methods for the fluid-structure interaction simulation of blood flow through a real stenosed artery. The artery geometry corresponds to a severely stenosed (around 75% lumen reduction) portion of the brachiocephalic trunk, located immediately upstream of the bifurcation of this vessel into the right subclavian and right common carotid arteries. The patient-specific geometry was segmented from medical images of a computerized tomography scanner from an individual with the subclavian steal syndrome. Doppler ultrasound velocity measurements were used to determine and impose patient-specific boundary conditions. The numerical simulations were performed in commercial software, Ansys and COMSOL, with a comparative second order discretization for the pressure, velocity and displacement variables. The results of this research disclosed a reasonable overall agreement between the predicted hemodynamics for both approaches. The finite volume method software (Ansys) proved to be more efficient in computational time and memory requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available