4.7 Article

Motion-Based Calibration of Multimodal Sensor Extrinsics and Timing Offset Estimation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 1215-1229

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2016.2596771

Keywords

Calibration and identification; extrinsics; field robots; timing offset

Categories

Funding

  1. Rio Tinto Centre for Mine Automation, Australian Centre for Field Robotics, University of Sydney

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a system for calibrating the extrinsic parameters and timing offsets of an array of cameras, 3-D lidars, and global positioning system/inertial navigation system sensors, without the requirement of any markers or other calibration aids. The aim of the approach is to achieve calibration accuracies comparable with state-of-the-art methods, while requiring less initial information about the system being calibrated and thus being more suitable for use by end users. The method operates by utilizing the motion of the system being calibrated. By estimating the motion each individual sensor observes, an estimate of the extrinsic calibration of the sensors is obtained. Our approach extends standard techniques for motion-based calibration by incorporating estimates of the accuracy of each sensor's readings. This yields a probabilistic approach that calibrates all sensors simultaneously and facilitates the estimation of the uncertainty in the final calibration. In addition, we combine this motion-based approach with appearance information. This gives an approach that requires no initial calibration estimate and takes advantage of all available alignment information to provide an accurate and robust calibration for the system. The new framework is validated with datasets collected with different platforms and different sensors' configurations, and compared with state-of-the-art approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available