Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE
Volume 135, Issue 6, Pages 2637-2651Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02628-6
Keywords
Postmortem interval; Legal medicine; Negligence; Myiasis; Blow flies
Categories
Funding
- Projekt DEAL
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluates the importance of insect evidence in forensic cases, showing that despite its proven significance and scientific development, insects are rarely considered as a tool in forensic investigations due to a lack of awareness and late involvement of forensic entomologists.
This study highlights the importance of insect evidence by evaluating 949 insect-associated cases, including 139 entomological reports, from 2001 to 2019 at the Institute of Legal Medicine Frankfurt/Germany. With a high number of cases in the summer months and a low number in the colder season, 78.5% of the bodies were found indoors, regardless of year or month. In more than 80% of the cases, where PMI information was available (n = 704), the presumed PMI ranged from 1 to 21 days, a period during which entomological evidence can provide a day-specific estimate of PMImin. In cases where insects have been identified to species level (n = 279), most bodies were infested by one or two species with a maximum of 10 different species. Overall, a total of 55 insect species were found. Information on biology, activity and distribution of the most abundant taxa is given and applied for 5 case histories estimating different PMI(min)s of up to over 6 months. Despite proved importance and scientific development of forensic entomology, insects are still rarely considered as a tool in forensic case work. The main reasons are a lack of awareness and (too) late involvement of a forensic entomologist. Our work shows that forensic entomology is an independent discipline that requires specialist expertise.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available