4.1 Article

Surgeon variations in the perioperative evaluation of penile prosthesis patients

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 152-156

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00521-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to characterize the standard perioperative practices of penile prosthetic surgeons. A survey was conducted among prosthetic urologists to assess their preoperative and postoperative evaluation methods. The findings suggest that while most surgeons pay attention to grip strength and patient expectations before surgery, there is a lack of consistency in assessing sexual orientation, intended use of the implant, sexual activity, and partner satisfaction. The study highlights the need for improvement in these areas.
The objective of this study is to characterize the standard perioperative practices of penile prosthetic surgeons. A 24-question survey was sent to prosthetic urologists which assessed surgeon demographic and practice information, preoperative evaluation including assessment of sexual history, and postoperative assessment. The majority of surveyed penile implant surgeons (87.0%) assess patients' grip strength before surgery and 96.5% discuss patients' expectations before surgery. Less than half (42.6%) ask patients about their sexual orientation. Only 49.6% obtain a psychiatric history but 68.7% evaluate the impact of sexual function on patient self-esteem. A minority (35.5%) ask about the intended use of the implant and 63.5% commonly ask about partner sexual function. Few (26.1%) implanters regularly ask about the type of sexual activity patients engage in (i.e., oral, vaginal, anal). Postoperatively, 95.6% of implanters ask about patient satisfaction but only 67.2% routinely assess partner satisfaction. Only 18.6% of implant surgeons use a questionnaire to evaluate postoperative satisfaction. Penile prosthetic urologists can improve the consistency of assessment of patients' sexual orientation, intended use of the implant, type of sexual activity, and partner sexual function and satisfaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available