4.7 Article

Unstretched unburned flame speed and burned gas Markstein length of diluted hydrogen/air mixtures

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 14, Pages 9030-9044

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.217

Keywords

Laminar burning velocity; Markstein length; Flame speed; Hydrogen; Dilution

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [2129229]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [2129229] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fundamental combustion characteristics of H-2/air flames with the addition of actual H-2/air combustion residuals were examined experimentally and numerically. The results showed that the flame speed and adiabatic flame temperature decreased linearly with increasing diluent level, while the change in burned gas Markstein length was more complex.
Fundamental combustion characteristics of H-2/air flames with the addition of actual H-2/air combustion residuals (a mixture of 65% N-2 + 35% H2O by mole) are examined experimentally and numerically at 1-2 bar, 373-473 K, equivalence ratio of 0.7, and dilution ratios of 0-40%. Spherically expanding flame measurements at constant pressure show that flame speed and adiabatic flame temperature drop almost linearly with increasing diluent level. Detailed numerical simulations and analyses of sensitivity coefficients reveal that this is because of the low chemical reactivity of the dilution mixture. On the other hand, the change in burned gas Markstein length with the dilution mixture addition is found more complex and cannot be represented with a linear trend. Experimental flame speed data are compared with results of chemical kinetic analyses obtained by several chemical mechanisms in order to assess the accuracy of these models. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available