4.7 Article

Methanol steam reforming over PdZn/ZnAl2O4/Al2O3 in a catalytic membrane reactor: An experimental and modelling study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 22, Pages 11574-11588

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.186

Keywords

Hydrogen; CFD model; Methanol steam reforming; Catalytic membrane reactor; Palladium-based catalyst; Pd-Ag membranes

Funding

  1. MICINN/FEDER [RTI2018-093996-B-C31, GC 2017 SGR 128]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [063/2018]
  3. Addlink Software Cientifico S.L. [063/2018]
  4. MICINN [RYC2019-026704-I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a catalytic membrane reactor equipped with Pd-Ag metallic membranes and loaded with PdZn/ZnAl2O4/Al2O3 catalytic pellets was tested and modeled for the methanol steam reforming reaction.
A catalytic membrane reactor equipped with Pd-Ag metallic membranes and loaded with PdZn/ZnAl2O4/Al2O3 catalytic pellets was tested for the methanol steam reforming reaction (S/C = 1) aimed at producing a pure hydrogen stream for PEM fuel cell feeding. The catalyst was prepared in two steps. First, commercial gamma-Al2O3 pellets were impregnated with ZnCl2 and calcined at 700 & DEG;C to obtain a ZnAl2O4 shell, and subsequently impregnated with PdCl2 and reduced at 600 & DEG;C to obtain PdZn alloy nanoparticles. The catalyst was tested both in a conventional packed bed reactor and in a catalytic membrane reactor. A 3D CFD non-isothermal model with mass transfer limitations was developed and validated with experimental data. The reactions of methanol steam reforming, reverse water-gas shift and methanation were modeled under different pressure, temperature and feed load values. The model was used to study and simulate the CMR under different operation conditions.& nbsp;(c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available