4.7 Article

Mechanistic insights on the catalytic hydrogenation of cyclohexene by ruthenium(III) N2O2 tetradentate Schiff-base complex

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 80, Pages 39786-39798

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.213

Keywords

Reaction mechanism; DFT; Hydrogenation; Cyclohexene; Ruthenium(III); Naphthaldiimine

Funding

  1. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia [TURSP-2020/05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the catalytic hydrogenation of cyclohexene by a newly synthesized ruthenium(III) Schiff base complex using various physicochemical methods. It was found that the catalytic activity depends mainly on solvent composition. Density functional theory was applied to explore the mechanistic story of the catalytic reaction.
The work aimed at the mechanistic investigation of the catalytic hydrogenation of cyclohexene by a newly synthesized ruthenium(III) Schiff base complex, [RuLCl(H2O)], where L represents tetradentate N2O2 naphthaldiimine. Several physicochemical methods were used to characterize the target complex. Furthermore, it was observed that the catalytic activity relies mainly on solvent composition. On the other hand, the density functional theory (DFT) was applied to explore the mechanistic story of the catalytic reaction. The findings showed that the complex has two stable isomers (trans and cis), which serve as platforms for the destination toward the hydrogenation journey through the in-situ generation of the active catalysts. Accordingly, one can imagine them as robust and weak machines for cyclohexane production in the reaction vessel. Interestingly, the experimental and the theoretical total activation energies are so comparable which supports the validity of the mechanistic insights. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available