4.6 Article

Suitability analysis and revised strategies for marine environmental carbon capture and storage (CCS) monitoring

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103510

Keywords

CCS monitoring; Leakage detection; Leakage attribution; Leakage quantification; Monitoring strategy; Suitability analysis

Funding

  1. European Union [654462]
  2. ACTOM Act on Offshore Monitoring project (Accelerating CCS Technologies, Horizon2020 Project) [294766]
  3. UK Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
  4. UK's Natural Environmental Research Council: the SPITFIRE project [NE/L002531/1]
  5. Climate Linked Atlantic Sector Science (CLASS) project through the single centre national capability programme [NE/R015953/1]
  6. Carbonate Chemistry Autonomous Sensor System (CarCASS) project [NE/P02081X/1]
  7. Bayesian Monitoring Design (Bay-MoDe) by Research Council of Norway through the CLIMIT programme [254711]
  8. Max Planck Society, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study conducted environmental monitoring experiments on offshore Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) complexes, finding that various monitoring methods demonstrate high sensitivity and certainty, meeting a wide range of operational requirements.
Environmental monitoring of offshore Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) complexes requires robust methodologies and cost-effective tools to detect, attribute and quantify CO2 leakage in the unlikely event it occurs from a sub-seafloor reservoir. Various approaches can be utilised for environmental CCS monitoring, but their capabilities are often undemonstrated and more detailed monitoring strategies need to be developed. We tested and compared different approaches in an offshore setting using a CO2 release experiment conducted at 120 m water depth in the Central North Sea. Tests were carried out over a range of CO(2 )injection rates (6 - 143 kg d(-1)) comparable to emission rates observed from abandoned wells. Here, we discuss the benefits and challenges of the tested approaches and compare their relative cost, temporal and spatial resolution, technology readiness level and sensitivity to leakage. The individual approaches demonstrate a high level of sensitivity and certainty and cover a wide range of operational requirements. Additionally, we refer to a set of generic requirements for site-specific baseline surveys that will aid in the interpretation of the results. Critically, we show that the capability of most techniques to detect and quantify leakage exceeds the currently existing legal requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available