4.7 Article

A Probabilistic Transmission Planning Framework for Reducing Network Vulnerability to Extreme Events

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 3829-3839

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2498611

Keywords

Power system planning; wind power; risk management; extreme events

Funding

  1. CSIRO Future Grid Flagship Grant Project 2 co-planning and optimization of gas and electricity networks
  2. China Southern Power Grid Research [WYKJ00000027]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71331001, 71420107027, 71071025, 71271033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The restructuring of electric power industry has brought in plenty of challenges for transmission expansion planning (TEP), mainly due to uncertainties. The commonly used probabilistic TEP approach requires the network to meet an acceptable risk criterion. However, a series of blackouts in recent years caused by extreme weather-related events have raised the concerns about network vulnerability through calculating the expected risk value. In this paper, we have proposed the concept that TEP should be economically adjusted in order to make network less vulnerable to extreme events (EEs) caused by climate change, e.g., floods or ice storms. We firstly give the explicit definitions of economic adjustment (EA) index and adjusted risk value. Then we formulate our model as a risk-based decision making process while satisfying the deterministic criterion. The proposed approach is tested on the IEEE 118-bus system. Results based on various risk aversion levels are given and comparison studies with other risk-based TEP approaches have been done. Also, sensitivity analysis of parameter setting has been conducted. According to the numerical results, the proposed risk-based TEP model is a flexible decision-making tool, which can help decision makers make a tradeoff between economy and security.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available