4.5 Article

Effects of different crop starches on the cooking quality of Chinese dried noodles

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 2080-2092

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.15488

Keywords

Correlation; crop starch; noodle qualities; starch properties

Funding

  1. National Barley and Highland Barley Industry Technology System Program [CARS-05-18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the effects of seven starches from different crop sources on noodle quality. Potato starch showed better solubility and swelling power, leading to higher water absorption, cooking loss, and breakage ratio in the noodles made from it. Various correlations were found between starch properties and noodle quality, such as the positive correlations between cooking breakage ratio with solubility, swelling power, peak viscosity, trough viscosity, and final viscosity values of starches.
To investigate the effects of seven starches made from different crop sources on noodle quality, Chinese dried noodles made from various reconstituted flours were prepared and analysed. Potato starch had better solubility and swelling power than the other starches, leading to higher water absorption, cooking loss and breakage ratio of the potato starch noodles. The correlation results unravelled that the cooking breakage ratio of noodles presented positive correlations with solubility, swelling power, peak viscosity (PV), trough viscosity (TV) and final viscosity (FV) values of starches. Besides, the adhesiveness of noodles showed a positive correlation with conclusion temperature (T-c) and setback viscosity (SV) values of starches. Moreover, the peak temperature (T-p) value of starches was negatively correlated with cooking loss; the granule size of starches had a positive correlation with noodles water absorption; and the peak time (PkT) value of starches represented positive relationships with noodles chewiness, shearing force and breaking strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available