4.7 Article

Crack configuration feature and fracture surface difference for high pressure die casting hypereutectic Al-Si alloys in high cycle fatigue

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106469

Keywords

Synchrotron X-ray tomography; CT technique; Hypereutectic Al-Si alloy; Fatigue

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0403801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1932205, 51775297]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fatigue crack surfaces of three high pressure die casting hypereutectic Al-Si alloy plates were characterized using synchrotron X-ray tomography and CT technology. The analyses showed that the Si content affected crack morphology and behavior, with primary silicon particles acting as obstacles for crack propagation.
Fatigue crack surfaces for three high pressure die casting hypereutectic Al-Si alloy plates were characterized by synchrotron X-ray tomography and CT technology. Focused on the retained pores, microvascular network analyses offered an innovative method to obtain crack configuration feature and analyze the crack propagation behavior in low ductility hypereutectic alloys which in-situ experiments were hard to achieve. With more Si content, the crack local thickness difference along the crack propagation path was more obvious and laid the foundation for more local tortuous morphology. With less Si content, the crack size was tapered and more branches occurred as a way to elongate the crack length. As rigid phases in the microstructure, primary silicon particles worked as obstacle for the whole crack propagation and their volume content agreed with the overall crack fluctuation. Therefore, the difference of flat propagation surface in three alloys was explained by crack configuration difference and crack deflection based on PSPs obstacle effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available