4.7 Article

Impact of specific high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes on survival in oropharyngeal cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 150, Issue 7, Pages 1174-1183

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33893

Keywords

head and neck cancer; HPV genotype; human papillomavirus; oropharyngeal cancer; oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. Villadsen Family Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of HPV genotypes on survival in HPV+ OPSCC patients. Results showed no significant difference in survival between HPV16 and non-HPV16 genotypes, but patients with other genotypes had worse survival outcomes. Genotyping in OPSCC may be interesting from an epidemiological perspective and in vaccination programs, but is not necessary for prognostication of HPV+ OPSCC.
The increases observed in incidence and survival of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have been attributed to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, but the survival-impact of specific genotypes is poorly understood. We investigated the potential influence of HPV genotypes on survival in HPV-positive (HPV+) OPSCC. All patients with HPV+/p16+ OPSCC and available genotype data within the period 2011 to 2017 in Eastern Denmark were included. Descriptive statistics on clinical and tumor data, as well as overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with Cox hazard models and Kaplan-Meier plots were performed. Overall, 769 HPV+/p16+ OPSCC patients were included of which genotype HPV16 accounted for 86% (n = 662). Compared to high-risk non-HPV16 genotypes (HR non-HPV16), HPV16 patients were younger at diagnosis (median years, 60 vs 64), had a higher male to female ratio (3.7:1 vs 2.1:1), and lower performance scores of <= 1 (90%, n = 559, vs 81%, n = 74). Regarding 5-year OS and RFS, no difference was observed between HPV16 and HR non-HPV16 patients. Subgrouping the HR non-HPV16 group into HPV33 (n = 57), HPV35 (n = 26) and other genotypes (n = 24) a significantly worse OS in the other genotypes group (hazard rate: 2.33, P = .027) was shown. With similar survival results between HPV16 and non-HPV16 genotypes, genotyping in OPSCC is interesting from an epidemiological point of view as well as in vaccination programs, but not a necessary addition in prognostication of HPV+/p16+ OPSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available