4.7 Article

Facile formation of injectable quaternized chitosan/tannic acid hydrogels with antibacterial and ROS scavenging capabilities for diabetic wound healing

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 190-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.007

Keywords

Tannic acid; Quaternized chitosan; Injectable hydrogel; Reactive oxygen species scavenging; Diabetic wounds

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Public Welfare Science and Technology Project [LGF21H140006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ22E030011]
  3. Wenzhou Medical University [KYYW201906, KYYW201901]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully constructed a hydrogel dressing with excellent ROS scavenging and antibacterial properties, which can promote wound healing and improve the therapeutic effects of skin defect models in diabetic rats.
The wound healing process of the diabetic wound is often hindered by excessive oxygen free radicals and infection. An ideal wound dressing should possess great reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging property and considerable antibacterial ability. In this study, we facilely constructed a novel hydrogel dressing with excellent ROS scavenging property and outstanding antibacterial performance by introducing tannic acid (TA) into quaternized chitosan (QCS) matrix. Attributing to the suitable physical crosslinking between TA and QCS, this QCS/ TA hydrogel was endowed with injectable and self-healing properties, which could avoid the various external squeezing on the irregular shape by wound dressing. The results showed that it could promote coagulation, suppress inflammation and expedite collagen deposition in the skin defect model of diabetic rats. This study provides a facile and convenient method for constructing injectable hydrogel dressing, which has application potentials in the clinical management of diabetic wounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available